hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: First release candidate for HBase 0.99.0 (RC0) is available. Please vote by 09/17/2014
Date Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:09:08 GMT
>I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What do
>folks think?  The new deploy topology will surprise going from earlier
>version. Better folks enable it explicitly*?

Yes. I was not able to test HBASE-11604 last night, that's why it was not
involved in this RC. Let me test it and
commit the patch. If RC sinks (HBASE-11947 or some other reason) we'll have
it off by default.

Enis

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> Thanks for doing the helpful writeup Enis. It helps doing evaluation.
>
> I have one question below.
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
> ...
>
> >
> > Starting with 0.99.0, the HBase master server and backup master servers
> > will
> > also act as a region server. RPC port and info port for web UI is shared
> > for
> > the master and region server roles. Active master will be hosting the
> meta
> > table (and other hbase system tables, acl and namespace) by default
> > (unless configured otherwise). The master and backup masters will not be
> > hosting user level regions. See HBASE-10569 and HBASE-11604 for more
> > details.
> >
>
> I think we should change this so this is NOT the default in 1.0. What do
> folks think?  The new deploy topology will surprise going from earlier
> version. Better folks enable it explicitly*?
> St.Ack
>
> * I used to be in favor of this feature being on by default but I have
> since changed my mind given how I see meta hosting evolving in the
> near-future.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message