Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FA1911263 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67421 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2014 23:36:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 67332 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2014 23:36:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 67312 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2014 23:36:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:36:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of enis.soz@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.177] (HELO mail-yk0-f177.google.com) (209.85.160.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:35:48 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 79so12157639ykr.36 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:35:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=fZNnDzBnxlFSVRy/TwyLjANZppZdjtKWlLyhhAeBShg=; b=R7VPsk5IHIdeTBcYMTBDNWX43AGwaaA8OfpYxtIMwYU0PeTu0V9wivOMxoWcMCEePv S37kDQz57ED3kuMRfUjnKqJY8sRID/afqoW1/FZMiJfmzWCtb7lSSimS31Ys1S459Lwn d0If8PFBtHJz1mNtJDRLffvats1SR/LzQqoVn5flVZpNG9VBc5HVWQs9dJPM3YrxMkwn T+7aFrgN9ofPWEgWAM2EEWR3CWbTbZt9lQZ3KvB1S+PoR1/4JfVUzJybAH/5UWhmGOge vyOKgVmilDZwiUhKQcu04AnbBFb2uKoEJtteh3A+6LLfrZhZyKztTtSIccM3tGUEwB+n jGMw== X-Received: by 10.236.15.6 with SMTP id e6mr45825198yhe.43.1409096146957; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:35:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.219.68 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:35:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:35:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will cut 0.99 first RC on Sep 2 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a0c444b3f14050190c3c4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013a0c444b3f14050190c3c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks JM. This 0.99.0 is a non-production release. So If we discover any perf issues, we can address them later in 0.99.1. We do not have to sink the RC. Enis On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Sep 8th might be good as long as Lars or Andrew don't target this date to= o > ;) I need about 4 days to run all the perfs tests, and few days for the > rest of the tests. That's why I ask if it's possible to have at least a > week between releases. > > Let's do our best ;) > > JM > > > 2014-08-26 17:07 GMT-04:00 Enis S=C3=B6ztutar : > > > They will be out of RC. I think by the time 0.99.1 comes around, I plan > to > > kick out everything from 1.0 that does not have a patch or a plan. > > > > Enis > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > > > bq. more active in kicking these out > > > > > > Can you clarify whether the subtasks would be out of 0.99.0 RC or out > of > > > 1.0 ? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is past due but I was focussed elsewhere. I am thinking of > cutting > > > the > > > > first RC for 0.99.0 release on Sep 2. > > > > > > > > As a reminder, this will be a developer release, not for production= . > > > There > > > > will be no guarantees for backwards and forwards binary / source > > compat. > > > > But this release will allow us to test compatibility for eventual 1= .0 > > > which > > > > should support rolling upgrades from 0.98 and migration from 0.94. > > > > > > > > There has been some progress on the API front (thanks to Carter and > > > others) > > > > and I intend to continue on this line of work (HBASE-10602 etc) > before > > > > final 1.0 which should not be long. > > > > > > > > Some major portion of other subtasks of > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10856 are still open. > I'll > > > be > > > > more active in kicking these out unless there is some progress arou= nd > > it. > > > > Feel free to leave a comment here or in the issue, if you want to g= et > > > your > > > > issue in. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Enis > > > > > > > > > > --089e013a0c444b3f14050190c3c4--