hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:43:13 GMT
Just to clarify the numbers, it's transactions per seconds. Like for
RandomScanWithRange100Test it's the number for 100 lines scans done per
seconds. So the bigger, the better.

The last 4 are just the time spent to perform the test.

JM


2014-07-03 10:10 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>:

> Oh, sorry. There was some formating, seems it got lost...
>
> Here is the Google document: http://goo.gl/1uHs98
>
> Let me know if it's better.
>
> JM
>
>
> 2014-07-03 9:55 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:
>
> Jean-Marc:
>> Thanks for posting results.
>>
>> It is not easy to read.
>> Can you reformat the results ?
>>
>> On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Here are the perfs tests results. Someone on the user list asked few
>> days
>> > ago about perfs between 0.94 and 0.98. So I have put also 0.98 on my
>> > results here. Basically, as I said yesterday, no negativ perf impact for
>> > 0.94.21. Each test run 10 times (except the last 4) and I remove the 2
>> > extremes.
>> >
>> > JM
>> >
>> >
>> > 0.94.200.94.21 0.98.2FilteredScanTest 0,230,22 0,25RandomReadTest 808815
>> > 1 107RandomSeekScanTest 172169 201RandomScanWithRange10Test 286279 277
>> > RandomScanWithRange100Test 147145 161RandomScanWithRange1000Test 38,22
>> 37,27
>> > 50 SequentialReadTest1 217 1 1991 392 SequentialWriteTest13 732 13
>> 39119 455
>> > RandomWriteTest14 091 13 64219 708 GaussianRandomReadBenchmark9 404 9
>> 435
>> > 10 777 SequentialReadBenchmark2 938 638 3 074 8153 335 239
>> > SequentialWriteBenchmark912 469 913 573833 654
>> UniformRandomReadBenchmark
>> > 10 299 10 35811 762 UniformRandomSmallScan233 583 234 083277 850
>> > LoadTestToolreal 19m30.113s
>> > user 37m12.300s
>> > sys 11m19.224s real 19m26.099s
>> > user 36m1.740s
>> > sys 11m41.704sreal 14m40.709s
>> > user 28m56.892s
>> > sys 12m6.364sIntegrationTestLoadAnVerify real 4m11.269s
>> > user 1m32.904s
>> > sys 0m7.176s real 4m7.288s
>> > user 1m31.704s
>> > sys 0m6.780sreal 2m38.295s
>> > user 1m24.500s
>> > sys 0m6.036sHLogPerformanceEvaluation 10431,988 10629,025n/a
>> > IntegrationTestBigLinkedListreal 6m0.125s
>> > user 3m0.004s
>> > sys 0m11.312s real 6m17.616s
>> > user 2m58.684s
>> > sys 0m10.492S real 9m9.284s
>> > user 3m31.576s
>> > sys 0m19.828s
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014-07-02 21:22 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org
>> >:
>> >
>> >> So far performances are similar to 0.94.21. So green from my side too.
>> I
>> >> will post detailed results later tonight or tomorrow morning.
>> >>
>> >> JM
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2014-07-02 18:29 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Ted & Andy.
>> >>> With my +1 we have the required 3 binding votes, will release 0.94.21
>> >>> tomorrow.
>> >>>
>> >>> -- Lars
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>> From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 1:25 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is
>> available
>> >>> for download
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> Checked md5 sum
>> >>> Checked signature
>> >>> Apache RAT check passes.
>> >>> Unit test suite passed (using jdk 1.7.0_25)
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> MD5 sum is good
>> >>>> Signature is good
>> >>>> Unpacked tarball, structure looks good.
>> >>>> Ran Apache RAT, check passed**.
>> >>>> Local compile and build was successful (with 7u60)
>> >>>> Unit test suite passes 10 times out of 10
>> >>>> Ran LoadTestTool, no errors, logs look good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ** - You have to remove docs/ and generated web.xml files under
>> >>>> hbase-webapps/ first. Going forward I think we should release a
>> source
>> >>> only
>> >>>> tarball and a second -bin "binary convenience" artifact.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> The 1st 0.94.21 RC is available for download at
>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.21-rc0/
>> >>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 0.94 development is continuing to wind down, HBase 0.94.21 is
a
>> small
>> >>> bug
>> >>>>> fix release with 9 fixes:
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-10692] - The Multi TableMap job don't support the
security
>> >>>>> HBase cluster
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-11052] - Sending random data crashes thrift service
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-11096] - stop method of Master and RegionServer
>> >>> coprocessor is
>> >>>>> not invoked
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-11234] - FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock returns
>> >>> wrong
>> >>>>> result
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-11341] - ZKProcedureCoordinatorRpcs should respond
only to
>> >>>>> members
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-11414] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-7711 rowlock release
>> >>> problem
>> >>>>> with thread interruptions in batchMutate
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-8495] - Change ownership of the directory to bulk
load
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-10871] - Indefinite OPEN/CLOSE wait on busy RegionServers
>> >>>>>    [HBASE-10935] - support snapshot policy where flush memstore
can
>> >>> be
>> >>>>> skipped to prevent production cluster freeze
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The list of changes is also available here:
>> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326794
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Here's the test run for this RC:
>> >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.21/30/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin,
etc,
>> and
>> >>>>> vote +1/-1 by EOD July 3rd on whether we should release this
as
>> >>> 0.94.21.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -- Lars
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>   - Andy
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>> >>>> (via Tom White)
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message