hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:52:43 GMT
Hey ;) But I'm born in France ;) So all my settings in my computer and my
GMail are in French where , is the decimal separator and . is the thousands
separator.

Like 1.234,56$ in French are $1,234.56 in English. All the opposite ;) When
I publish on my blog I usually make sure to change that. I might be able to
change the settings for this specific file but I'm sure it's not that bad
with a coma ;)

I try to always add every new release in this document. So you might want
to keep the link for future releases...

JM


2014-07-03 10:46 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:

> The google doc is so much easier to read.
>
> Nit: 39,40 would be written as 39.4 in US, right ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> > wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify the numbers, it's transactions per seconds. Like for
> > RandomScanWithRange100Test it's the number for 100 lines scans done per
> > seconds. So the bigger, the better.
> >
> > The last 4 are just the time spent to perform the test.
> >
> > JM
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-03 10:10 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> >:
> >
> > > Oh, sorry. There was some formating, seems it got lost...
> > >
> > > Here is the Google document: http://goo.gl/1uHs98
> > >
> > > Let me know if it's better.
> > >
> > > JM
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-07-03 9:55 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Jean-Marc:
> > >> Thanks for posting results.
> > >>
> > >> It is not easy to read.
> > >> Can you reformat the results ?
> > >>
> > >> On Jul 3, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Here are the perfs tests results. Someone on the user list asked few
> > >> days
> > >> > ago about perfs between 0.94 and 0.98. So I have put also 0.98 on
my
> > >> > results here. Basically, as I said yesterday, no negativ perf impact
> > for
> > >> > 0.94.21. Each test run 10 times (except the last 4) and I remove
> the 2
> > >> > extremes.
> > >> >
> > >> > JM
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 0.94.200.94.21 0.98.2FilteredScanTest 0,230,22 0,25RandomReadTest
> > 808815
> > >> > 1 107RandomSeekScanTest 172169 201RandomScanWithRange10Test 286279
> 277
> > >> > RandomScanWithRange100Test 147145 161RandomScanWithRange1000Test
> 38,22
> > >> 37,27
> > >> > 50 SequentialReadTest1 217 1 1991 392 SequentialWriteTest13 732 13
> > >> 39119 455
> > >> > RandomWriteTest14 091 13 64219 708 GaussianRandomReadBenchmark9 404
> 9
> > >> 435
> > >> > 10 777 SequentialReadBenchmark2 938 638 3 074 8153 335 239
> > >> > SequentialWriteBenchmark912 469 913 573833 654
> > >> UniformRandomReadBenchmark
> > >> > 10 299 10 35811 762 UniformRandomSmallScan233 583 234 083277 850
> > >> > LoadTestToolreal 19m30.113s
> > >> > user 37m12.300s
> > >> > sys 11m19.224s real 19m26.099s
> > >> > user 36m1.740s
> > >> > sys 11m41.704sreal 14m40.709s
> > >> > user 28m56.892s
> > >> > sys 12m6.364sIntegrationTestLoadAnVerify real 4m11.269s
> > >> > user 1m32.904s
> > >> > sys 0m7.176s real 4m7.288s
> > >> > user 1m31.704s
> > >> > sys 0m6.780sreal 2m38.295s
> > >> > user 1m24.500s
> > >> > sys 0m6.036sHLogPerformanceEvaluation 10431,988 10629,025n/a
> > >> > IntegrationTestBigLinkedListreal 6m0.125s
> > >> > user 3m0.004s
> > >> > sys 0m11.312s real 6m17.616s
> > >> > user 2m58.684s
> > >> > sys 0m10.492S real 9m9.284s
> > >> > user 3m31.576s
> > >> > sys 0m19.828s
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2014-07-02 21:22 GMT-04:00 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> > >> >:
> > >> >
> > >> >> So far performances are similar to 0.94.21. So green from my side
> > too.
> > >> I
> > >> >> will post detailed results later tonight or tomorrow morning.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> JM
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2014-07-02 18:29 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks Ted & Andy.
> > >> >>> With my +1 we have the required 3 binding votes, will release
> > 0.94.21
> > >> >>> tomorrow.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -- Lars
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> ________________________________
> > >> >>> From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 1:25 PM
> > >> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.21 release candidate
is
> > >> available
> > >> >>> for download
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> +1
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Checked md5 sum
> > >> >>> Checked signature
> > >> >>> Apache RAT check passes.
> > >> >>> Unit test suite passed (using jdk 1.7.0_25)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Cheers
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> +1
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> MD5 sum is good
> > >> >>>> Signature is good
> > >> >>>> Unpacked tarball, structure looks good.
> > >> >>>> Ran Apache RAT, check passed**.
> > >> >>>> Local compile and build was successful (with 7u60)
> > >> >>>> Unit test suite passes 10 times out of 10
> > >> >>>> Ran LoadTestTool, no errors, logs look good.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> ** - You have to remove docs/ and generated web.xml files
under
> > >> >>>> hbase-webapps/ first. Going forward I think we should
release a
> > >> source
> > >> >>> only
> > >> >>>> tarball and a second -bin "binary convenience" artifact.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org
> >
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> The 1st 0.94.21 RC is available for download at
> > >> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.21-rc0/
> > >> >>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> 0.94 development is continuing to wind down, HBase
0.94.21 is a
> > >> small
> > >> >>> bug
> > >> >>>>> fix release with 9 fixes:
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-10692] - The Multi TableMap job don't support
the
> > security
> > >> >>>>> HBase cluster
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-11052] - Sending random data crashes thrift
service
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-11096] - stop method of Master and RegionServer
> > >> >>> coprocessor is
> > >> >>>>> not invoked
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-11234] - FastDiffDeltaEncoder#getFirstKeyInBlock
> returns
> > >> >>> wrong
> > >> >>>>> result
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-11341] - ZKProcedureCoordinatorRpcs should
respond
> only
> > to
> > >> >>>>> members
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-11414] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-7711 rowlock
release
> > >> >>> problem
> > >> >>>>> with thread interruptions in batchMutate
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-8495] - Change ownership of the directory
to bulk load
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-10871] - Indefinite OPEN/CLOSE wait on busy
> > RegionServers
> > >> >>>>>    [HBASE-10935] - support snapshot policy where flush
memstore
> > can
> > >> >>> be
> > >> >>>>> skipped to prevent production cluster freeze
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> The list of changes is also available here:
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326794
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Here's the test run for this RC:
> > >> >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.21/30/
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it
for a spin,
> etc,
> > >> and
> > >> >>>>> vote +1/-1 by EOD July 3rd on whether we should release
this as
> > >> >>> 0.94.21.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Thanks.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> -- Lars
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> --
> > >> >>>> Best regards,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>   - Andy
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting
back. -
> Piet
> > >> Hein
> > >> >>>> (via Tom White)
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message