hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4
Date Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:37:38 GMT
Hey Enis, I know you are away but I'm still pinging you on relevant JIRAs
for your reference upon your return.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Andrew. Just skimmed over the jiras there. Nothing concerning for
> now.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Enis,
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I would prefer option 1.
> >
> > There are 11 changes pending for .5. I just moved HBASE-10560 out on
> > account of it being potentially controversial.
> >
> > When you have a moment, please do a JQL search for 'project = HBase AND
> > fixVersion = 0.98.5 AND statusCategory not in (Complete)' and let me know
> > if you find any of them concerning.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Andrew,
> > >
> > > I will be off for 2 weeks between 7/26 and 8/10. Obviously I cannot
> > review
> > > patches for branch-1 in a timely manner in that time window.
> > >
> > > I think we can do either:
> > >  1. we commit patches that you accept to 0.98 to branch-1 as well. I'll
> > go
> > > over the patches once I am back, and hopefully before the RC vote ends
> > > (though I do not expect we will need to revert a patch).
> > >  2. commit patches to master only (except bug fixes) and I'll do a bulk
> > > review when I get back and then you can spin the RC.
> > >
> > > At this stage of branch-1, I think most of the patches applicable to
> 0.98
> > > should be acceptable to branch-1 as well, so I would recommend we do 1.
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > BTW, I also intend to spin the first 0.99.0RC around Aug 12.
> > >
> > > Enis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm thinking about rolling 0.98.5RC0 on August 4 to return to having
> > 0.98
> > > > releases happen in the beginning of a month as was typical up until
> > > 0.98.4.
> > > > There have been 10 issues resolved for 0.98.5 already, and there are
> 8
> > > > working days / 12 calendar days until 8/4 for additional work to
> land.
> > > Any
> > > > concerns about this?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message