hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
Subject Re: Thinking of branching for 1.0 by June 23
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:16:31 GMT
For people voting, can you please put small comments regarding why you
prefer a solution versus the other one? Just for knowledge sharing...

Thanks,

JM


2014-06-10 19:05 GMT-04:00 Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>:

> I think jiras on ZK abstraction can still get committed (I'll make sure to
> have all non-trivial patches posted on RB for discussion to make sure we
> don't accidentally introduce any instability).
>
> On jiras.
>
> Under HBASE-10909:
>  -  HBASE-11069 (region merge transaction) is close to completion, just
> needs rebasing/merging, so we should have the new patch soon
>  -  HBASE-11072 (WAL splitting) - there's progress going on here, I think
> we're going to have patch up for reviews pretty soon.
>  -  HBASE-11073 (abstract Zk Watcher and listeners) - should have first
> patch up for review in a week or two
>
> Besides that, we should have HBASE-4495 (get rid of CatalogTracker) too.
>
> Further steps on abstraction (involving changing/simplifying the way we
> keep state in ZK) require coordination engine (as described in consensus
> design doc), which has been proposed in hadoop-common (for the time being I
> guess we can add this engine directly to HBase to speedup development?).
>
> Mikhail
>
>
>
>
> 2014-06-10 15:46 GMT-07:00 Stack <stack@duboce.net>:
>
> > +1 on option b)
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on the #2.
> > >
> > > One question though: do you envision that the work around coordinated
> > > replication won't be able to go into branch-1 anymore?
> > >
> >
> > Its not done and it is far along with Mikhail making good progress. I'd
> be
> > up for keeping up reviews and commit (if thats OK w/ you Mr. RM).
> >
> > How much you think could make 1.0 Cos/Mikhail?  Which issues.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message