hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jdk 1.7 & trunk
Date Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:39:38 GMT
Try compiling with Oracle Java 6. Same result ?

> On Jun 25, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Back in time of JDK6 GA - when I was still working in Sun's JDK team - we had
> companies sitting on 1.4 and paying _a lot_ of money for Sun support of it.
> So...
> 
> That said, I think moving to JDK7 is pretty much has happened already for
> HBase, because e.g. 0.98.2 can not be build with JDK6 because we see
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8479
> in Bigtop CI.
> 
> Cos
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:29AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>> Er, I mean no user should be running on a runtime less than 7, they are all
>> EOL...
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Should we be 1.7 only for trunk / 1.0?
>>>> This would mean using the 1.7 features.
>>> 
>>> I think this is prudent. Hadoop common is having a similar discussion and
>>> I think converging on consensus that they would be ok with their trunk
>>> including features only available in 7.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> What about .98?
>>> 
>>> ​I don't think this is an option, because although no user should be
>>> running with a 7 runtime (and in fact performance conscious users should be
>>> looking hard at 8), vendors will still have to support customers on 6. ​
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>>   - Andy
>>> 
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)

Mime
View raw message