hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: We have our first victim
Date Fri, 23 May 2014 22:35:14 GMT
Makes sense, earlier Jake was talking about how 'trunk' is a "protected
branch".


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> I think INFRA only disables force-pushes to the master: the rest of the
> branches is a fair game ;)
>
> Cos
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:12PM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> > I just had to fix up the history on the 0.94 branch, because I forgot to
> > rebase after a pull (and I had some committed changes already).
> >
> > git will happily let you push stuff, even if that messes up the history
> (and
> > reorder commits, in my case my local change was ordered before the pulled
> > changes).
> > It's not wrong, since I should have rebased my changes. Just... uhm...
> surprising :)
> >
> >
> > Scary, but it worked and at least git gives me enough tools to fix
> things.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 10:22 AM
> > Subject: We have our first victim
> >
> >
> > Ram pushed up a commit as a new branch 'trunk' instead of to 'master'. I
> > will file an infra ticket to nuke the new branch 'trunk' as this is going
> > to confuse people. Objections?
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > ═  - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message