Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-44233-apmail-hbase-dev-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2030D10D7F
	for <apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue,  1 Apr 2014 04:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 50094 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2014 04:50:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48553 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2014 04:50:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48537 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2014 04:50:02 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 04:50:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.176 as permitted
 sender)
Received: from [209.85.192.176] (HELO mail-pd0-f176.google.com)
 (209.85.192.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 04:49:57 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id r10so8929722pdi.7
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=FonKEVj1dWzBAiv5u5oX14dALY4g49EPsyszN2m6/mI=;
        b=yHUzdIlrfy7N/3kKhmzq3cBLKeo3gBoWtnMGly9ucVqqit7Wj10xL/ZL/8glMm3c/w
         BPwosWSqbG7z9rLZ1BnSlAzcCJfJ75y+1rB9Efdx+aYbbJCfAOrbQ7jlnw5Fx5/jCfuu
         ZEZ0++kj6CMRv51P819IDcldFmRGAjtc3tisQhcbrHvZ5/FHeLGKwmfdudjCq7248zA+
         Zkly7QE3zL+tZuskTzIM/SImABldUKO1+5zJQX9cDhBaDyNV23l1DbjymuRWh5dx3oXK
         4ALsWexUWJ2rWufJGcE73fYkjcrb291G7Or/DtKL1myOZQTKV7bFjroNqRvo+/KvDHc0
         xO0A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.203.39 with SMTP id kn7mr7500929pbc.141.1396327777185;
 Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.7.161 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALvzVW31P=hgpmTejXA-kJNPSmr3hpXGzSN5+9Gxn1_NSu1YqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_CB8oprRKmZXrjGvWspqXPB_cfJq-Bh2EkVsZon8GzxKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgGVDs7ZJCiResohoMquWCYAwP7Pu4hc9gpF2BWV84ZeiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvzVW31P=hgpmTejXA-kJNPSmr3hpXGzSN5+9Gxn1_NSu1YqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:19:37 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAAT7MkriKM0mu-kFPyvxfRhx4HQW8g87-wsDUjd3=dnqkT4imw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available
 for download
From: ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com>
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <user@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15b07f26340604f5f3e535
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--047d7b15b07f26340604f5f3e535
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1 on the RC.
Checked the signature.
Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.  Everything looks
fine.
Compaction, flushes etc too.

Regards
Ram



On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Checked the hash
> Checked the tar layout.
> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good after ITBLL
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good.  UI seems fine.
> >
> > Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip of the
> > branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically work (small big linked
> list
> > test worked).
> >
> > TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> >
> > I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is too
> > occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal rig
> > running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing green
> > running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
> at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also
> > > available in the temporary repository
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> > >
> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >
> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > >
> > >
> > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> > (00:00
> > > PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.1.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>

--047d7b15b07f26340604f5f3e535--