Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E423B11099 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31031 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2014 18:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30908 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2014 18:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 30891 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2014 18:20:15 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:20:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wg0-f41.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username apurtell, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:20:14 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so1214345wgh.0 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.92.177 with SMTP id cn17mr39895797wjb.18.1398277213366; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.226.17 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:19:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Purtell Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:19:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regarding removal of deprecated APIs To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7beb91aa99afe404f7b9c816 --047d7beb91aa99afe404f7b9c816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think some committed issues have already deprecated in 0.98 and removed in trunk. None come to mind at the moment. Why would we not sort out API issues in the pre 1.0 versions so 1.0 has no deprecated crap out of the gate? On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > +1. My suggestion: feel free to remove anything marked deprecated at or > before 0.94. We should keep the deprecated 0.96 and 0.98 apis in 1.0 > > Jon. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Anoop John > wrote: > > > Hi Devs, > > We have many client APIs deprecated since older versions (92+ I > > have seen . Do we have any guideline for removing those? (when) The > > current Trunk going tp be 1.0, I think this is the time for cleanp.. > What > > do u say? > > > > -Anoop- > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > // jon@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --047d7beb91aa99afe404f7b9c816--