hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:59:22 GMT
This is already committed. So if we have a new RC, this issue also will get
in.

-Anoop-

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Fabien LE GALLO <flegallo@ubikod.com> wrote:

> Can we also include HBASE-10848 in 0.98.1 ?
> This is another issue related to filters, not as critical as HBASE-10850
> but it would be great to have it in this release.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we can fix this in 98.1
> > release
> > > itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses essential
> CF
> > > optimization.
> > >
> > > Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
> > >
> > > Considering those we need a new RC.
> > >
> > > -Anoop-
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 on the RC.
> > >> Checked the signature.
> > >> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> > >> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.  Everything
> looks
> > >> fine.
> > >> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Ram
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Checked the hash
> > >>> Checked the tar layout.
> > >>> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good after ITBLL
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good.  UI seems fine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase against a tip
of
> > >> the
> > >>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically work (small big
> linked
> > >>> list
> > >>>> test worked).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but in case he is
too
> > >>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten our internal
rig
> > >>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it has been passing
> > >> green
> > >>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> St.Ack
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for
> > >> download
> > >>> at
> > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/ and Maven artifacts
> > >> are
> > >>>> also
> > >>>>> available in the temporary repository
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > >>>> (00:00
> > >>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release this as
0.98.1.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   - Andy
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet
> > >>> Hein
> > >>>>> (via Tom White)
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>     Fabien Le Gallo
> * Software Engineer * * , * * Capptain *
>     ------------------------------
>   * e. * flegallo@capptain.com
>  * w. * http://www.capptain.com
>  * a. * 18 rue Tronchet, 75008 Paris, France
>   <
> https://www.facebook.com/capptain?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
> <
> https://twitter.com/capptain_hq?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
> <
> http://www.capptain.com/feed/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
> <
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDowgVp4zmA?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
>     4 Tips to Market Your App
> <
> http://www.capptain.com/2014/03/26/4-tips-for-marketing-your-app/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
>
> <
> http://www.capptain.com/contact/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature
> >
>   IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately
> and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message