hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Taylor <jtay...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 17:13:16 GMT
+1 to Andrew's suggestion. @Anoop - would you mind verifying whether or not
the TestSCVFWithMiniCluster written as a Phoenix query returns the correct
results?


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>wrote:

> This would be my preference also.
>
> Can someone provide a definitive statement on if a critical/blocker bug
> exists for Phoenix or not? If not, we have sufficient votes at this point
> to carry the RC and can go forward with the release at the end of the vote
> period.
>
>
> > On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:57 PM, James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com> wrote:
> >
> > I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it
> > can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it
> > seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
> > additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
> >
> >    James
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Ram
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Understood, Andy.
> >>>
> >>> I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1
> >>> vote
> >>>> and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take
> >> the
> >>>> time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file
> >>>> blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1.
> >>>> 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we can fix this
in 98.1
> >>>> release
> >>>>>> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses
> >> essential
> >>>> CF
> >>>>>> optimization.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Considering those we need a new RC.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Anoop-
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 on the RC.
> >>>>>>> Checked the signature.
> >>>>>>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> >>>>>>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.  Everything
> >>> looks
> >>>>>>> fine.
> >>>>>>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Ram
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Checked the hash
> >>>>>>>> Checked the tar layout.
> >>>>>>>> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good after
ITBLL
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good. 
UI seems fine.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase
against a tip
> >>> of
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically work
(small big
> >>> linked
> >>>>>>>> list
> >>>>>>>>> test worked).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but
in case he is
> >> too
> >>>>>>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten
our internal
> >>> rig
> >>>>>>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it
has been
> >> passing
> >>>>>>> green
> >>>>>>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> St.Ack
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell
<
> >>>> apurtell@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3)
is available for
> >>>>>>> download
> >>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and Maven
> >> artifacts
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>> available in the temporary repository
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found
here:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1
by midnight Pacific
> >>> Time
> >>>>>>>>> (00:00
> >>>>>>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should
release this as
> >>> 0.98.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> - Andy
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth
by hitting back. -
> >>> Piet
> >>>>>>>> Hein
> >>>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message