hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Taylor <jtay...@salesforce.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:20:25 GMT
It's just the optimization that's (sometimes) broken, right? The scan
still returns the correct results, no?

> On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> James:
> HBASE-10850 is not just about SingleColumnValueFilter. See Anoop's comment:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10850?focusedCommentId=13958668&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13958668
>
> The test case Fabien provided uses SingleColumnValueFilter but the defect
> has deeper implication beyond making SingleColumnValueFilter unusable in
> certain scenarios.
>
> I am find with giving the next RC a bit shorter voting period.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>
>> I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it
>> can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it
>> seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
>> additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
>>
>>    James
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ram
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Understood, Andy.
>>>>
>>>> I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>> andrew.purtell@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only +1
>>>> vote
>>>>> and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please take
>>> the
>>>>> time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or file
>>>>> blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1.
>>>>> 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Anoop's assessment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we can fix this in
>> 98.1
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix uses
>>> essential
>>>>> CF
>>>>>>> optimization.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Considering those we need a new RC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Anoop-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
>>>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 on the RC.
>>>>>>>> Checked the signature.
>>>>>>>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
>>>>>>>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.  Everything
>>>> looks
>>>>>>>> fine.
>>>>>>>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Ram
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <
>> eclark@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Checked the hash
>>>>>>>>> Checked the tar layout.
>>>>>>>>> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good after
ITBLL
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good.  UI
seems fine.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in hbase
against a
>> tip
>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically work
(small big
>>>> linked
>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>> test worked).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder but
in case he is
>>> too
>>>>>>>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has gotten
our
>> internal
>>>> rig
>>>>>>>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and it
has been
>>> passing
>>>>>>>> green
>>>>>>>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> St.Ack
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell
<
>>>>> apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3)
is available for
>>>>>>>> download
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and Maven
>>> artifacts
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> available in the temporary repository
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found
here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by
midnight
>> Pacific
>>>> Time
>>>>>>>>>> (00:00
>>>>>>>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should release
this as
>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by
hitting back. -
>>>> Piet
>>>>>>>>> Hein
>>>>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>

Mime
View raw message