Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E770411C75 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43056 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2014 18:12:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42996 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2014 18:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 42955 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2014 18:12:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:12:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.174] (HELO mail-qc0-f174.google.com) (209.85.216.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:12:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c9so6306709qcz.5 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=jGgKnVHM7rabxDAkx0UuOkDipBHTUQRWdOxWEmQKxW4=; b=Zc4f1xBzJS2gzmDxqIOLAXGRDCBIp103mUg/yo8PINTsVFOL3eSipRXl5ra1/bHuGw Wjv/5fTqndxdzxjbVRFLrvcfpCsmN67XVzl//comT3lTt47GxByWbvJxTssbvyiUmCe/ vIo75m23kX7yMJnyob54v8Jz6UFbf02ep5LN0m34e3xBrkz7dV7trT/Fa+6QgVYPBC09 viYvFJvZIf7q2ulaRO8LuKbtDHHQ+SCrsmE+gHE3M4ZW+3m5EDoSTuOqsfLp0Eg9/SnI LvnxQEuiJFUv+Al25swnXYM5R2UcU4dg4TVS/wzRyqD6KVjdzsKtLAeKGz5PZ0gwUlDt xxBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.84.231 with SMTP id l94mr55042116qgd.75.1395684740818; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.96.165.74 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:12:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hQ8RaXUqrRuQpQ3ud7XGARAcDkU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regressions on upgrading from 0.94 to 0.96 From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1198a31f05b04f55e2d30 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c1198a31f05b04f55e2d30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Ishan Chhabra wrote: > When looking at HBASE-8063< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8063>, > I noticed that it was backported to 0.94 > (HBASE-8198) > but not to 0.96. I don't know if this was intentional or if it was just > missed. Missing this patch could impact performance on certain kinds of > queries. > We try to avoid having older versions have features that are then missing from later versions. The commit to 0.94 is done w/o comment/justification in the issue. Maybe a discussion was held elsewhere and not cited. > > Are there any other known features/fixes that did not get ported to 0.96 > but got ported to 0.94? > Hopefully none Ishan. It is a but in our process if there is. St.Ack --001a11c1198a31f05b04f55e2d30--