hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hadoop1 support in 0.98/1.0
Date Thu, 06 Mar 2014 01:06:35 GMT
bq. Maybe a new hadoop-compat module for 2.3.0 +?

+1


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > But if we instead allow that our versioning currently is of-kilter --
> Lars
> > Hofhansl has argued off-line that 0.96.0 should have been 1.0
> >
>
> Related, is Hadoop 2.3.0 more like 3.0 ?
>
> If, for example, we wanted to pin the HFiles of IN_MEMORY tables in HDFS's
> centralized cache, as HDFS-4949 suggests, then how different will our view
> of the HDFS interfaces be between 2.0.0 and 2.3.0+? Would the (I'm
> guessing) necessary reflection be a perf issue? Maybe a new hadoop-compat
> module for 2.3.0 +? Or drop support for Hadoop < 2.3.0 ?
>
> Point is - after we finish this discussion about Hadoop 1 or not (seems
> not), then what to do about the different flavors of Hadoop 2.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message