hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:52:34 GMT
Yes. 

With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1

Thanks 

On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ted, is that a -1?
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
>> 
>> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some  flexibility.

>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 
>>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today
or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6? 
>>> 
>>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends
on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will
be better served by waiting. 
>>> 
>>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from
.1. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>>> Namely:
>>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>>>> in secure deployment
>>>> 
>>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>>> 
>>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>>> principals.
>>>> 
>>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>>>> work in secure deployment.
>>>> 
>>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0
and
>>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> this RC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode
but this
>>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for
download
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts
are
>>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find
a new
>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
Time
>>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release
this
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet Hein
>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 

Mime
View raw message