hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:48:35 GMT
Ted, is that a -1?

> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
> 
> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some  flexibility.

> 
> Cheers
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or
tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6? 
>> 
>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on
having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will
be better served by waiting. 
>> 
>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1.

>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>> Namely:
>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user
>>> in secure deployment
>>> 
>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop
>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>> 
>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>> principals.
>>> 
>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels
>>> work in secure deployment.
>>> 
>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>> 
>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>> 
>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL.
>>>>> 
>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant
>>>>> to
>>>>> this RC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but
this
>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
>>>>> at
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts
are
>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new
>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release
this
>>>>> as
>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>> 
>>>> 

Mime
View raw message