hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download
Date Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:44:18 GMT
Ok, RC3 coming up by tomorrow. 


> On Mar 29, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes. 
> 
> With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1
> 
> Thanks 
> 
>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ted, is that a -1?
>> 
>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1
>>> 
>>> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some  flexibility.

>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today
or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6? 
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends
on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will
be better served by waiting. 
>>>> 
>>>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from
.1. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue
>>>>> with cell visibility labels.
>>>>> Namely:
>>>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by
>>>>> visibility label in secure deployment
>>>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and
user
>>>>> in secure deployment
>>>>> 
>>>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect:
>>>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously
drop
>>>>> labels due to mismatching username.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName()
>>>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos
>>>>> principals.
>>>>> 
>>>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility
labels
>>>>> work in secure deployment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed.
>>>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - checked documentation and tarball
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode
>>>>>> - checked the UI pages
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and
ITIBLL.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0
and
>>>>>>> 0.98.1
>>>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled
>>>>>>> "Comparsion
>>>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still
relevant
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> this RC.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode
but this
>>>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available
for download
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts
are
>>>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find
a new
>>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
Time
>>>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should
release this
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> 0.98.1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet Hein
>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Andy
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back.
- Piet Hein
>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 

Mime
View raw message