hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
Date Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:34:25 GMT
I'd like to see a bunch of our @Deprecated APIs cleaned up. Delete stale
methods or remove the annotations.


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> Suggestions for 1.0.0 if if it is to come out in next month or so:
>
> + Update included libs (e.g. move to log4j2)
>
> + Enable distributed log replay as default (fix bugs)
> + Enable hfilev3 as default.
> + Ship with default logging level set to INFO and content of the logs still
> makes sense
>
> What else?
>
> + Enable dynamic config and schema by default.
>
>
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm happy to volunteer. Happy if Enis does it, too.
> >>
> >>
> > I'd be happy to do it too but my thinking is that it is good to spread
> the
> > role around.
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>   ------------------------------
> >>  *From:* Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> >> *To:* HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> >> *Cc:* lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> >> *Sent:* Monday, January 20, 2014 1:43 PM
> >> *Subject:* Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think whether we will need a new RM will depend on the decision to
> >> release 1.0 from 0.98 branches or 0.99 branches(current trunk).
> >>
> >>
> >> I think it should have an RM regardless.  We should probably try to put
> a
> >> higher polish on a 1.0 than we would mayhaps on a lesser release.  RM
> will
> >> have enough work on their plate just keeping up state (IMO).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We can do the previous practice of releasing 0.99.0, then turning 0.99.x
> >> as
> >> the 1.0.0. In that case, I can also volunteer as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> Good by me.  Anyone else interested in the job?   Speak up if so.
> >>
> >> If not, you'd get it by default Enis.  Else you and whoever will have to
> >> dook it out.
> >>
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message