hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:58:03 GMT
It is desirable if HBASE-9203, the umbrella JIRA for secondary indexing, is
given some reviews.

Cheers


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <jzhong@hortonworks.com>wrote:

>
> + HBASE-8763 Combine MVCC and SeqId
> Currently replication is broken on same version updates in the following
> scenarios: when a region move or RS get restarted in the source cluster,
> replicated changes may come out of order to the receiving RS. There are
> other cases we need to keep the ordering of puts. This JIRA can be used to
> fix those above issues.
>
> + Replicated Meta Regions for Distributed Region Location Lookup(I haven't
> cut a JIRA for it but I've been thinking this for a while)
>
>
> On 2/10/14 4:42 PM, "lars hofhansl" <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >+ a clearly defined compatibility strategy between patch, minor, and
> >major versions
> >+ known coprocessor interfaces. For example right now a coprocessor can
> >use everything on HRegion. We need to distill what's useful into an
> >interface.
> >+ (wishes for ponies and unicorns, probably not going to happen) better
> >ops supports, such as sample puppet/chef/etc scripts
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> > From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> >To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> >Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 4:29 PM
> >Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
> >
> >
> >Keep them coming and I'll file issues against 1.0 version.
> >Thanks lads,
> >St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> + fix interface audience annotations (HBASE-10462).
> >> + Continue on limiting some broad reaching interfaces (HCM, HCI, HTable)
> >> See recent HBASE-10479 discussions)
> >> + Promote HTableInterface vs HTable, getting connections from HCM and
> >> getting tables there.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Steve Loughran
> >><stevel@hortonworks.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On 10 February 2014 09:24, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Suggestions for 1.0.0 if if it is to come out in next month or
so:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > + Update included libs (e.g. move to log4j2)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > love to see how that goes on -it looks good but I've not seen it in
> >> > > production yet. I do note it has a NoSQL outputter, so there are
> >>good
> >> > > opportunities for recursion
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > Smile.
> >> >
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message