hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
Subject Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:42:34 GMT
+ a clearly defined compatibility strategy between patch, minor, and major versions
+ known coprocessor interfaces. For example right now a coprocessor can use everything on
HRegion. We need to distill what's useful into an interface.
+ (wishes for ponies and unicorns, probably not going to happen) better ops supports, such
as sample puppet/chef/etc scripts



________________________________
 From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> 
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
 

Keep them coming and I'll file issues against 1.0 version.
Thanks lads,
St.Ack



On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com> wrote:

> + fix interface audience annotations (HBASE-10462).
> + Continue on limiting some broad reaching interfaces (HCM, HCI, HTable)
> See recent HBASE-10479 discussions)
> + Promote HTableInterface vs HTable, getting connections from HCM and
> getting tables there.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On 10 February 2014 09:24, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Suggestions for 1.0.0 if if it is to come out in next month or so:
> > > >
> > > > + Update included libs (e.g. move to log4j2)
> > > >
> > >
> > > love to see how that goes on -it looks good but I've not seen it in
> > > production yet. I do note it has a NoSQL outputter, so there are good
> > > opportunities for recursion
> > >
> > >
> > Smile.
> >
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message