Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+RK=_D0hV=BwGZOhK05m5rxuyVuXRzQ88odKbKwCH_cm2P3JA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgFfjLpp7h=-UDhVUQwyu7wV1JDuEMkgmf9zkEQ8zkMcOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1388692333.46462.YahooMailNeo@web140606.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <CA+RK=_D0hV=BwGZOhK05m5rxuyVuXRzQ88odKbKwCH_cm2P3JA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= <enis@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:20:25 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAMUu0w8uJ1+4ysTZnp+AL3gE=S_Kp4fV5cVWVh-18_HkPS4VuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Cc: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb70ca2e4758b04ef035d55

--047d7bb70ca2e4758b04ef035d55
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I think whether we will need a new RM will depend on the decision to
release 1.0 from 0.98 branches or 0.99 branches(current trunk).

We can do the previous practice of releasing 0.99.0, then turning 0.99.x as
the 1.0.0. In that case, I can also volunteer as well.

Enis


On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> Yeah, I want to have an 0.98 RC in the test rig by week's end. So that
> would be artifacts for voting available next week.
>
> My suggestion is a 1.0 release 3 months or so from when 0.98.0 ships. This
> is arbitrary, but seems reasonable to me as enough time to get some
> production experience with 0.96 and/or 0.98, sort out the remaining API
> issues for a 1.0 caliber release, and do whatever else needs doing
> (tooling).
>
> Having one RM for any given release will avoid split-brain issues. :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:52 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'd be volunteering for RM.Maybe do it together?
> > Personally I'd like to see some heavy production usage of 0.96 or 0.98 in
> > the community before can call the new "DNA" (HBase >= 0.96) 1.0.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> > To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2014 11:26 AM
> > Subject: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0
> >
> >
> > Andrew is talking of the first 0.98RC being imminent.
> >
> > Time to start in on the release that will follow 0.98.x.  We seem to all
> be
> > good with calling it 1.0.0.  Speak up if you think different. (I just
> added
> > a 1.0.0 version to JIRA).
> >
> > + What should 1.0.0 have in it beyond what is in 0.98.
> > + Why can't 1.0.0 just be 0.98.0, or 0.98.1 altogether?
> > + When should it come out?  I'm thinking soon after 0.98. Feb/March?
> > (Presuming 0.98 ships in Jan).
> > + Who should RM it? (I could but perhaps others are interested).
> >
> > What else should we consider achieving the state of 1.0.0ness?
> >
> > Happy New Year all,
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

--047d7bb70ca2e4758b04ef035d55--