Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5B3510FF6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73402 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 01:15:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73217 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 01:15:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73209 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2014 01:15:56 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-wi0-f178.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username apurtell, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:56 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so84821wib.11 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:15:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pxT77PVwwF7AhItMHOaIbvvMSOut/yer/BecNa2MZUM=; b=hYMWxI5TSMg3bAje+XC90R6IQV1KPtXUG18gk0Bx6zY1Kp5XPM3HDW8P+ntLro4s/S 7Dm+TBJTtOuS3Y2Pv7vcCyfQODnT8YUnKaIyByJLkLWHbEVOC7jk4qLoEmaC7h89T/Yq MJSyCCclssF2V6VcOM7hgGFIqBO3InURc1tDXzuZidqz/w0/sCjYH811Zhu8SFjrzLHV zmHEqfdtdnB+DfFi0dT8yXIDFcwGYVpkzZsIyKoLPleKF7EWdld0VgMZJngGdPkspSn4 J2z26eTeBsWVjqegfiHK+XCyY083FQcVN+dQPRJWlqPPSfmNTSb60MhzxSq/SS8lG9cR pN6g== X-Received: by 10.194.143.40 with SMTP id sb8mr21961774wjb.15.1390353354597; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:15:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.152.8 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:15:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Purtell Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:15:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115e78cd02c8404f084ddc9 --089e0115e78cd02c8404f084ddc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 There is also a suspicious failure in https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one > outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and > are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net > positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the > opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some > lingering coprocessor related issues. > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC. >> >> >> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote: >> >>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say. >>> Sounds good Andrew, >>> St.Ack >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell >> >wrote: >>> >>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch. >>> There are >>> > two items left that are a must I feel: >>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity >>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to >>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and >>> I >>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon. >>> > >> >> > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --089e0115e78cd02c8404f084ddc9--