Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOtJ30r_2x50ewrz=RoHyxfjAyhfL-DyqtUvQO2De2DSmibX+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_BsLmHAS4w_XQzhq0kN+i0kAKj+LJ88FMbW8WzHaoPOOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+RK=_BbzS6J3hyRJbScB+=cTtFWAJEuasRNJED9HPqqncL9Cg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1389247977.86225.YahooMailNeo@web140602.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CAOtJ30r_2x50ewrz=RoHyxfjAyhfL-DyqtUvQO2De2DSmibX+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:10:44 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_C+5wq6J1u5g2wCmwojkhd2gyWrNOc_9u-t25ck+iB8LA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Next week I would like to roll the first 0.98.0 RC
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba975b6d4863304ef844e5b

--047d7ba975b6d4863304ef844e5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes.

Some kind of paste-o, sorry.

On Wednesday, January 8, 2014, Anoop John wrote:

> You mean HBASE-10304 Andy?
>
> -Anoop-
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:42 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > HBASE-10249 does not look like a blocker to me.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 9:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: Next week I would like to roll the first 0.98.0 RC
> >
> >
> > An update.
> >
> > There are three open issues for flapping unit tests. These are relatively
> > minor, and one HBASE-10249) I can't reproduce.
> >
> > I plan to do HBASE-6873 tomorrow.
> >
> > We have a new blocker, HBASE-10249.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Next week I would like to roll the first 0.98.0 RC. Let's see.
> > >
> > > Some remaining work needs committing. Then, will work up a Google Docs
> > > spreadsheet for package checks, unit test suite runs, and cluster
> testing
> > > with hbase-it, LoadTestTool, and YCSB, and fill it in.
> > >
> > > The unit test suite is looking "ok". There are occasional failures on
> > > builds.apache.org, but these may have system load as the underlying
> > > cause. Unit test suite runs on more well endowed EC2 VMs are passing
> > > consistently. Let me add the caveat that I have so far not completed
> > > running through the full VM-OS matrix:
> > >
> > > VM:
> > >
> > >
> > >    - Oracle JDK 6
> > >       - Oracle JDK 7
> > >       - OpenJDK 7
> > >       - OpenJDK 8*
> > >
> > > OS (unit tests):
> > >
> > >
> > >    - Amazon Linux
> > >       - RHEL 6.4
> > >       - Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 LTS
> > >       - Ubuntu Server 13
> > >
> > > OS (cluster);
> > >
> > >
> > >    - Amazon Linux
> > >       - RHEL 6.5
> > >
> > > If I identify repeatable test failures under a particular combination,
> > > then I'll open a blocker JIRA for it. Regarding failures on
> > > builds.apache.org, if there are JIRAs filed for these we should
> > certainly
> > > take a look but I suggest (and personally will be inclined to)
> weighting
> > > more highly evidence gathered from testing elsewhere.
> > >
> > > * - Java 8 tests are just for my own curiosity. Actually, you may be
> > > pleasantly surprised to know that all unit tests for HBase 0.98 and
> trunk
> > > were consistently passing on a Java 8 build a few weeks ago.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--047d7ba975b6d4863304ef844e5b--