hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergey Shelukhin <ser...@hortonworks.com>
Subject multi() contract or lack thereof
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:32:42 GMT
Looking at code, the way multi currently works is that either the entire
thing fails with an exception, or multiresponse is returned with exactly
one result/exception per action in multiaction, in corresponding order.
This sounds like a reasonable API contract, but it could be "by accident".
Do you think we can rely on this remaining true?
That way I can remove passing action index from client back and forth thru
the server (with backward compat ofc).

NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message