hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Branch 0.98 update and soft freeze
Date Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:15:14 GMT
There is also a suspicious failure in
https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/100/ that I'm now looking into.


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I apologize for the delay in tagging the 0.98.0 RC. There is one
> outstanding blocker - HBASE-10322. I think we have rounded the curve and
> are headed home on it. In the meantime holding up the RC has been a net
> positive I think, we've had issues come up like HBASE-10384 and the
> opportunity to get them into the RC. In addition I've had time to fix some
> lingering coprocessor related issues.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Yes, as long as we keep filing blockers there won't be any RC.
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 12, 2014, Stack wrote:
>>
>>> HBASE-10321 should be done before RC I'd say.
>>> Sounds good Andrew,
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > I am just about ready to tag the 0.98.0RC and release the branch.
>>> There are
>>> > two items left that are a must I feel:
>>> > - HBASE-6873, which I will get to at the next opportunity
>>> > - An issue with insuring tags are not inappropriately sent back to
>>> > unprivileged users, which Ram and Anoop have been discussing here, and
>>> I
>>> > think Anoop will post a JIRA and patch for soon.
>>> >
>>
>>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message