Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C267C10412 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11294 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2013 03:53:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11159 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2013 03:53:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 11123 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2013 03:53:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:53:16 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:53:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "cuijianwei (JIRA)" To: dev@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HBASE-10152) improve VerifyReplication to compute BADROWS more accurately MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 cuijianwei created HBASE-10152: ---------------------------------- Summary: improve VerifyReplication to compute BADROWS more accurately Key: HBASE-10152 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10152 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement Components: Replication Affects Versions: 0.94.14 Reporter: cuijianwei VerifyReplicaiton could compare the source table with its peer table and compute BADROWS. However, the current BADROWS computing method might not be accurate enough. For example, if source table contains rows as {r1, r2, r3, r4} and peer table contains rows as {r1, r3, r4}, the BADROWS counter will be 3 because 'r2' in source table will make all the later comparisons fail. Will it be better if the BADROWS is computed to 1 in this situation? Maybe, we can compute the BADROWS more accurately in merge comparison? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.4#6159)