Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+RK=_CGzHCTHgOe3VHX4g8hXiBdXYk+iED+58ox+Pvdxd89EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_DAWODfc42nNaMZdL9n2pnZ=u+DbTr7ntEuGS4ZfLvL-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63Up4h1WyPXaqryscx9bH3czx0BX48C2ovsEWhdsio7OQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_CGzHCTHgOe3VHX4g8hXiBdXYk+iED+58ox+Pvdxd89EA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 20:41:52 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAPQV63WRYfoJsp5WRLTHX6K5M9JSHyJyOVcdEMvehmLurq89NA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects
To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c24df6eb091e04ed101ab9

--001a11c24df6eb091e04ed101ab9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Make sens to have trunk with JDK 7 too... But I'm not sure for 0.94... It's
mainly running in prod with JDK 6. So not sure we can align them all...


2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>

> I think all builds should be running JDK 7. I don't want to be only chasing
> JDK 7 related test issues on the 0.98 build alone.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> > wrote:
>
> > I agree. We should build 0.98 against JDK 7 instead of 6. JDK 6 End of
> > Public Updates since to February 2013. 0.98 is planned for 2014. Will be
> a
> > year after that. So I think it's time to move to JDK 7.
> >
> > My opinion ;)
> >
> > JM
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/8 Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> >
> > > I was looking for differences between the trunk and 0.98 builds since
> > > Jenkins projects for the former are passing while the latter are not.
> > Seems
> > > the trunk jobs are set up to use "JDK 1.6 (latest)" while the 0.98
> builds
> > > are set up to use "JDK 1.7 (latest)". For the time being I have set the
> > > 0.98 builds to also use JDK 6 to see if their results will mirror trunk
> > > afterward.
> > >
> > > However, I think we should be using JDK 7 or OpenJDK 7 to run all of
> our
> > > builds 0.96+. What do you think?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

--001a11c24df6eb091e04ed101ab9--