Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5A2E100E7 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37518 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 04:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 37031 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2013 04:11:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 37017 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2013 04:11:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:11:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.182] (HELO mail-lb0-f182.google.com) (209.85.217.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:11:12 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l4so5856743lbv.41 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:10:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZqQeu69R+XiVO7mpba+6vhHx+kioyCZWSJIw3Ob32hI=; b=AYsB3OjcNX7bHBJPUP2M/piChcFnJRWkL41jkQuASZ8QT7/+lOw0jy73dIT3vSkEEw PdTlhxcE73EvzzPRCdZHUjsCwEr5ff2h5Se/ek9OpyT+8aTly1ZfNZovU3+X5Eh1xTPL XWM3bd5H9fq5htDKmn9Vo20brolerTYiJo1hp1Y1TXi+xOOEBLCG5RglaEmSYxDdnpEn crNfvE8y53sCQTT8TZlFrNk0jGOd4FzzE6LF8j3inu0pSVRm/Z4VR32Z8pJUbWWH+Dib jZFEgqEC4gUSjtEMEAzrHjrn6rvBH5ADTPrdbQBA9UPW4S/IOFSj+t0o1/x5kDbVj/Tc uDRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.74 with SMTP id t10mr1358351lae.65.1388463050632; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.138.234 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:10:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 20:10:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Next week I would like to roll the first 0.98.0 RC From: Ted Yu To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01494164eab00d04eeccbeed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01494164eab00d04eeccbeed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 w.r.t. ubuntu5, the following issue has been resolved by Gavin: INFRA-7148 svn checkout encounters problem on ubuntu5 Cheers On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > This sounds good, Andy. > > For the moment, both HBase-0.98-on-Hadoop-1.1 and HBase-0.98 are green on > Apache Jenkins. I noticed that ubuntu5 consistently had problem with > subversion. > > When RC0 comes out, I definitely would give it a try. > > Cheers > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Next week I would like to roll the first 0.98.0 RC. Let's see. >> >> Some remaining work needs committing. Then, will work up a Google Docs >> spreadsheet for package checks, unit test suite runs, and cluster testing >> with hbase-it, LoadTestTool, and YCSB, and fill it in. >> >> The unit test suite is looking "ok". There are occasional failures on >> builds.apache.org, but these may have system load as the underlying >> cause. >> Unit test suite runs on more well endowed EC2 VMs are passing >> consistently. >> Let me add the caveat that I have so far not completed running through the >> full VM-OS matrix: >> >> VM: >> >> >> - Oracle JDK 6 >> - Oracle JDK 7 >> - OpenJDK 7 >> - OpenJDK 8* >> >> OS (unit tests): >> >> >> - Amazon Linux >> - RHEL 6.4 >> - Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 LTS >> - Ubuntu Server 13 >> >> OS (cluster); >> >> >> - Amazon Linux >> - RHEL 6.5 >> >> If I identify repeatable test failures under a particular combination, >> then >> I'll open a blocker JIRA for it. Regarding failures on builds.apache.org, >> if there are JIRAs filed for these we should certainly take a look but I >> suggest (and personally will be inclined to) weighting more highly >> evidence >> gathered from testing elsewhere. >> >> * - Java 8 tests are just for my own curiosity. Actually, you may be >> pleasantly surprised to know that all unit tests for HBase 0.98 and trunk >> were consistently passing on a Java 8 build a few weeks ago. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > --089e01494164eab00d04eeccbeed--