Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 190D710EF4 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63982 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2013 00:44:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63912 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2013 00:44:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 63904 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2013 00:44:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:44:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.49] (HELO mail-bk0-f49.google.com) (209.85.214.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:44:48 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id my13so466189bkb.36 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:44:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=uRYGVN7u+XdeIQYWftMVpAhcej9AzksMPcIQA3hl1r8=; b=UXh1AHAQvQKfy7AwEA1u0prpDv5VdeEtXHE379UfKpOWvJb6JyeZ6ft27uqSVWDOyx 6rZJgJesEDd8JLcKbPvPrWYCXc9lKt+I/eszZse7LcyBk1t/Sbzo1pDrdmU9QehmZl0K 82haa45vH+Z0k8xsAmOJtac3nb0EvwJdtu3uyLOECAaL8uQLb36nMGPygMzyao4tdGER eIU5FDAzNgxNDcd2bCSnKDcPnBHFwLlXegGgMsarHzOb0cDmVj1buEs8a+w5o5rTZKc/ Wi2EcHPcQRFfmkCeIXM+QK45UO6vPcBKw3QeVuRKZF0KCbNdkj3huxN/6YH87OzdNko2 eG2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.122.137 with SMTP id l9mr9179414bkr.23.1387413867579; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:44:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.95.67 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:44:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:44:27 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MwPVYAUPGEpIwrORN8qWygXlW0g Message-ID: Subject: Re: HBASE-7088 ready to commit ;) From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11335370bbfd8704edd876b2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11335370bbfd8704edd876b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RC at EOM sounds good Andy, St.Ack On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Stack wrote: > Here is what we decided as 'policy' on +1s: > > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#decisions > > At our last meetup, we talked of upping the commit friction some to give > chance for more review before commit but this suggestion did not progress > beyond discussion. > > St.Ack > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Andrew Purtell wrot= e: > >> AFAIK, we just don't want a committer to +1 their own work. >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Andrew Purtell >> wrote: >> >> > No >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Don't we need 2 commiters +1 per JIRA? >> >> Le 2013-12-18 18:23, "Andrew Purtell" a =C3=A9= crit : >> >> >> >> > Why is one +1 not good enough for commit? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Ted Yu >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > I gave +1 already >> >> > > >> >> > > Waiting for an extra +1 >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >> >> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > It's small and there for a while. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Thanks. >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Best regards, >> >> > >> >> > - Andy >> >> > >> >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >> Hein >> >> > (via Tom White) >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > >> > - Andy >> > >> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet He= in >> > (via Tom White) >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > --001a11335370bbfd8704edd876b2--