Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=lU9ql4GCyAsFFES1ZuV+3j1leaSttfdc4CgvECioz+2RKtYZUwTT45QlUZg+WAO28nwk/ek2WiBA/2SXqjEk69scPcocdBnGqR2+/igI2+VPsdjHbBGFgpcASP07M4EmGgYDEigCWxLTBuLksSO3k7KA3MkCS064b0SHq61/P3o=;
References: 
 <CA+RK=_DAWODfc42nNaMZdL9n2pnZ=u+DbTr7ntEuGS4ZfLvL-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63Up4h1WyPXaqryscx9bH3czx0BX48C2ovsEWhdsio7OQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_CGzHCTHgOe3VHX4g8hXiBdXYk+iED+58ox+Pvdxd89EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63WRYfoJsp5WRLTHX6K5M9JSHyJyOVcdEMvehmLurq89NA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62wJOs+0SQ_eey8jkOSFtWDUkM7BoN72=0vb2Scmxf8j6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1386563513.35291.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
 <CAPQV63V=UrqShpeT_5zJpQA1BjUkw0-=xkekSFOQUVHo6RzBDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1386629745.18764.YahooMailNeo@web140602.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 14:55:45 -0800 (PST)
From: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
Reply-To: lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPQV63V=UrqShpeT_5zJpQA1BjUkw0-=xkekSFOQUVHo6RzBDQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="-118416272-2100775044-1386629745=:18764"

---118416272-2100775044-1386629745=:18764
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Maybe for 0.94 we should do both after all.=0AThere will be installations o=
ut there with JDK 6 and we should make sure we do not break anything there.=
=0A=0AI'll set up an additional full build for 0.94 based on JDK 7.=0A=0A--=
 Lars=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Jean-Marc Spaggi=
ari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>=0ATo: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhan=
sl <larsh@apache.org> =0ASent: Monday, December 9, 2013 4:01 AM=0ASubject: =
Re: Default JDK settings for Jenkins projects=0A =0A=0ASo if we move 0.94 i=
n JDK 7, I guess we all agree there is no reason to=0Akeep trunk in JDK 6, =
right? Then we should all allign to JFK 7?=0A=0AJM=0A=0A=0A=0A2013/12/8 lar=
s hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>=0A=0A> JDK 6 was EOL'd Feb 2013. Even premium=
 support runs out this month.=0A> Apparently there is an extended support o=
ption until Dec 2016.=0A>=0A> Not sure who in their right mind would run a =
production system on JDK 6=0A> going forward. Even we (Salesforce) switched=
 wholesales to JDK 7 (including=0A> HBase 0.94), and we're extremely conser=
vative due to the uptime sensitive=0A> nature of our service.=0A>=0A>=0A> W=
e should switch the 0.94 builds over to JDK 7.=0A> Unless I hear strong/goo=
d reasons I'll do that and see what fails and then=0A> fix the issues.=0A>=
=0A> -- Lars=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> ________________________________=0A>=A0 From: =
Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>=0A> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apac=
he.org>=0A> Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2013 5:52 PM=0A> Subject: Re: Default=
 JDK settings for Jenkins projects=0A>=0A>=0A> There're several test failur=
es when running 0.94 test suite using jdk 1.7=0A>=0A> So there is some work=
 to be done before switching to jdk 1.7 for 0.94=0A>=0A> Cheers=0A>=0A>=0A>=
=0A> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <=0A> jean-marc@sp=
aggiari.org=0A> > wrote:=0A>=0A> > Make sens to have trunk with JDK 7 too..=
. But I'm not sure for 0.94...=0A> It's=0A> > mainly running in prod with J=
DK 6. So not sure we can align them all...=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > 2013/12/8 Andr=
ew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>=0A> >=0A> > > I think all builds should be=
 running JDK 7. I don't want to be only=0A> > chasing=0A> > > JDK 7 related=
 test issues on the 0.98 build alone.=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > > On Mon, Dec 9=
, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <=0A> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org=0A=
> > > > wrote:=0A> > >=0A> > > > I agree. We should build 0.98 against JDK =
7 instead of 6. JDK 6 End=0A> of=0A> > > > Public Updates since to February=
 2013. 0.98 is planned for 2014. Will=0A> > be=0A> > > a=0A> > > > year aft=
er that. So I think it's time to move to JDK 7.=0A> > > >=0A> > > > My opin=
ion ;)=0A> > > >=0A> > > > JM=0A> > > >=0A> > > >=0A> > > > 2013/12/8 Andre=
w Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>=0A> > > >=0A> > > > > I was looking for dif=
ferences between the trunk and 0.98 builds=0A> since=0A> > > > > Jenkins pr=
ojects for the former are passing while the latter are=0A> not.=0A> > > > S=
eems=0A> > > > > the trunk jobs are set up to use "JDK 1.6 (latest)" while =
the 0.98=0A> > > builds=0A> > > > > are set up to use "JDK 1.7 (latest)". F=
or the time being I have set=0A> > the=0A> > > > > 0.98 builds to also use =
JDK 6 to see if their results will mirror=0A> > trunk=0A> > > > > afterward=
.=0A> > > > >=0A> > > > > However, I think we should be using JDK 7 or Open=
JDK 7 to run all=0A> of=0A> > > our=0A> > > > > builds 0.96+. What do you t=
hink?=0A> > > > >=0A> > > > > --=0A> > > > > Best regards,=0A> > > > >=0A> =
> > > >=A0 =A0 - Andy=0A> > > > >=0A> > > > > Problems worthy of attack pro=
ve their worth by hitting back. - Piet=0A> > > Hein=0A> > > > > (via Tom Wh=
ite)=0A> > > > >=0A> > > >=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > >=0A> > > --=0A> > > Best =
regards,=0A> > >=0A> > >=A0 =A0 - Andy=0A> > >=0A> > > Problems worthy of a=
ttack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet=0A> Hein=0A> > > (via Tom W=
hite)=0A> > >=0A> >=0A>
---118416272-2100775044-1386629745=:18764--