hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branching 0.98
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:44:49 GMT
Do you mind creating a release tag for 99 in jira?

Thanks,
Enis


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I've branched for 0.98. Trunk now builds as 0.99.0-SNAPSHOT. The new branch
> 0.98 builds as 0.98.0-SNAPSHOT.  Checked the Git mirror, the new branch and
> POM updates have already made it over. Looks good.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details
> > come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the
> > svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in
> the
> > Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with
> Jenkins
> > karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >
> >> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm
> >> thinking about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
> >>
> >> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
> >> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
> >>
> >> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> >> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
> >>
> >> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> >> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> >> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031
> (Add
> >> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
> >>
> >> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> >> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> >> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts
> with
> >> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513
> (why
> >> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> >> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> >> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out
> except
> >> HBASE-7781.
> >>
> >> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> >> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> >> testing.
> >>
> >> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
> >>
> >> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed
> >> security features. I have it on good authority these will be completed
> this
> >> week. Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>    - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message