hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ANNOUNCE: hbase 0.96.1.1rc0 release candidate is available for download.
Date Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:53:07 GMT
bq. it would have been better to have included at that time the detailed
explanation

Will pay attention next time such situation arises.

Cheers


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I reviewed this change. As I understand, neither the code before and after
> is incorrect, but the improved behavior after the change allows us to pass
> reliably on Hadoop 2 with its timing changes. I did fail to ask Ted to
> write up a release note for the JIRA, so I am sorry for that.
>
> Also, Ted, if you reread this email thread, consider that when you sent the
> one line email to Jon about HBASE-10142, it would have been better to have
> included at that time the detailed explanation provided only after Jon
> wrote back twice asking for it.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > I've spent some time reviewing HBASE-10142, There are some non-test
> code
> > > modifications still trying to determine if it is a serious problem or
> not
> > > on that side.   Ted, is there a reason why this wasn't ported to the
> 0.96
> > > branch?
> > >
> >
> > Does the patch fix the issue?  What the 'issue' is, is not described and
> > the patch is introduced with 'What about this patch ?' and nothing else.
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message