hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBASE-6104
Date Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:07:46 GMT
>From https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8283/consoleFull :

/usr/bin/java
java version "1.6.0_20"

...

/home/jenkins/tools/java/latest
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)



On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I should also mention the precommit builds all passed, which suggests to me
> they are using JDK 7 also.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > HBASE-6104 introduced a feature developed and tested with JDK 7.
> > Subsequent to review and commit, two builds on ASF Jenkins began failing,
> > the 0.98 on Hadoop 1.1 build, and the trunk build. After chasing a red
> > herring that looked like a test only failure for a bit it seems the
> problem
> > was deeper and manifested on JDK 6. I have reverted the change,
> unscheduled
> > the feature from 0.98, and may return to it some time in the future after
> > the sting wears off. In the meantime, I have two suggestions:
> >
> > 1. We should set all of the primary builds like trunk and 0.98 on Hadoop
> > 1.1 to use JDK 7, like the other builds. The inconsistent use of JDK/JRE
> > version will be an occasional source of confusion.
> >
> > 2. We should explicitly set up jobs that use JDK/JRE 6 and name them as
> > such.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message