hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Hsieh <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [Shadow Regions / Read Replicas ]
Date Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:01:41 GMT
Fundamentally, I'd prefer focusing on making HBase "HBasier" instead of
tackling a feature that other systems architecturally can do better
(inconsistent reads).   I consider consistent reads/writes being one of
HBase's defining features. That said, I think read replicas makes sense and
is a nice feature to have.

A few thoughts:
- Both approaches need to have more failure handling cases thought out.
- I think the two goals are both worthy on their own each with their own
optimal points.  We should in the design makes sure that we can support
both goals.
- I want to making sure the proposed design have a path for optimal
fast-consistent read-recovery.

Jon.


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:

> HBASE-10070 [1]  looks to be heading into a discussion more apt for the
> mailing list than in the jira. Moving this to the dev list for threaded
> discussion.  I'll start a few threads by replying to this thread with
> edited titles
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10070
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>
>



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message