hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
Date Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:27:22 GMT
drop hadoop1 from 0.98? (-1 from andrew)


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:

> There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks
> stand on this?  Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct).
>
> deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh,
> andrew, amandeep)
> default to hadoop2 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from ted, larsh)
> drop hadoop1 from trunk? (-1 from enis, stack, andrew)
> drop hadoop1 from 0.98?
> drop hadoop1 from 1.0? (-1 from larsh)
>
> Relatedly -- is 1.0 going to be off of 0.98.x or a new compat breaking
> release of the current trunk?
>
> My votes are:
> +1 to deprecate on 0.98 and trunk
> +1 to default to hadoop2 on 0.98 and trunk
> +0 drop from trunk.  (if 1.0 is off of 0.98, +1 drop from trunk)
> -1 drop from 0.98
>
> Jon.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For trunk, are we going to support hadoop 1.0 ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for defaulting to Hadoop 2.
> > > At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :)
> > >
> > > -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a
> > > lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch.
> > >
> > > -- Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98.
> > > >
> > > > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We
> do
> > > not
> > > > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot
> > > > update their hadoops.
> > > >
> > > > Enis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe
> > > > > > even just drop it in 0.98?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 deprecate
> > > > > +0 drop
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // jon@cloudera.com
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message