hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: HBASE-6104
Date Thu, 26 Dec 2013 05:02:54 GMT
I should also mention the precommit builds all passed, which suggests to me
they are using JDK 7 also.


On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> HBASE-6104 introduced a feature developed and tested with JDK 7.
> Subsequent to review and commit, two builds on ASF Jenkins began failing,
> the 0.98 on Hadoop 1.1 build, and the trunk build. After chasing a red
> herring that looked like a test only failure for a bit it seems the problem
> was deeper and manifested on JDK 6. I have reverted the change, unscheduled
> the feature from 0.98, and may return to it some time in the future after
> the sting wears off. In the meantime, I have two suggestions:
>
> 1. We should set all of the primary builds like trunk and 0.98 on Hadoop
> 1.1 to use JDK 7, like the other builds. The inconsistent use of JDK/JRE
> version will be an occasional source of confusion.
>
> 2. We should explicitly set up jobs that use JDK/JRE 6 and name them as
> such.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message