hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Branching 0.98
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 00:08:59 GMT
As you've probably noticed I've been holding as some last minute details
come in. However I am going to make the branch today. I will just do the
svn copy some time in the afternoon here, so that will be overnight in the
Pacific timezone. It would be tremendously helpful if someone with Jenkins
karma could help set up jobs for the new branch once that's done.

On Thursday, November 28, 2013, Andrew Purtell wrote:

> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm thinking
> about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian
> army into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
> HBASE-7781.
> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> testing.
> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed security
> features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this week.
> Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
> --
> Best regards,
>    - Andy
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message