hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ANNOUNCE: hbase release candidate is available for download.
Date Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:47:12 GMT
I reviewed this change. As I understand, neither the code before and after
is incorrect, but the improved behavior after the change allows us to pass
reliably on Hadoop 2 with its timing changes. I did fail to ask Ted to
write up a release note for the JIRA, so I am sorry for that.

Also, Ted, if you reread this email thread, consider that when you sent the
one line email to Jon about HBASE-10142, it would have been better to have
included at that time the detailed explanation provided only after Jon
wrote back twice asking for it.

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I've spent some time reviewing HBASE-10142, There are some non-test code
> > modifications still trying to determine if it is a serious problem or not
> > on that side.   Ted, is there a reason why this wasn't ported to the 0.96
> > branch?
> >
> Does the patch fix the issue?  What the 'issue' is, is not described and
> the patch is introduced with 'What about this patch ?' and nothing else.
> St.Ack

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message