Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAg3a2oqpArix9_Myo8w9oTsAnKbQjQ_pwgdc8Z2VeGwGkbV4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHkeaHX=_avidx-=f78EWF-J4MEstErxds9A1tGW34uC2kNDSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62wCjc+c99Ex+ifyo7MJ0oVVGG8E+vFc-fWnCHGu7sqJBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHkeaHURoU14UkF61gyC+G8iwNEz0rAcW9C=GHwwVOOs2kavRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAg3a2oqpArix9_Myo8w9oTsAnKbQjQ_pwgdc8Z2VeGwGkbV4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:23:22 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAPQV63WLR7rY7_t5ovDz6gF67DckfnpYWyk2LoJuaMxgw+hhEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HBase 0.96.0 performace
To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11337576f1814104ec062364

--001a11337576f1814104ec062364
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

You can not send pictures to the list. Please post it on an external
website and provide the link here.


2013/11/25 Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodionov@gmail.com>

> Where is the picture, Jerry?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Re-attach the performance comparison picture.
> >
> > [image: Inline image 1]
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The picture didn't go through.
> >>
> >> Correction: the comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and 0.96.1 was done by
> >> Nicolas Liochon. This was not done at EBay.
> >>
> >> In my talk, there was another comparison to show that MTTR improved a
> lot
> >> from 0.94 to 0.96 - this was done at EBay.
> >>
> >> When Stack cuts 0.96.1 RC0, you would get the list of JIRAs that
> >> contributed to the speedup from 0.96.0 to 0.96.1
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,  Ted, and hbase experts
> >> >
> >> > Below picture is a performance comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and
> >> 0.96.1,
> >> > shared by Ted Yu in China Hadoop Summit today. This perf testing is
> >> said to
> >> > be executed on ebay's real cluster.
> >> >
> >> > It is surprising 0.96.0 is such worse compared to 0.96.1 and even
> >> 0.94.14.
> >> >  Are these numbers official and the performance degradation true?
> What
> >> > patch in 0.96.1 fixed this?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

--001a11337576f1814104ec062364--