hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Branching 0.98
Date Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:56:06 GMT
Andy:
Fix for HBASE-10005 was checked in.
Previously the test failure was observed on Linux. I will verify the fix
next week.

'HBASE-4811 Support reverse scan' has gone through 28 iterations of review.
Do you think it can make it to 0.98.0 ?

Cheers


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> It's come time to think about branching for the 0.98 release. I'm thinking
> about creating the branch in SVN on 12/1.
>
> Soon thereafter over here at Intel we are planning to airlift a simian army
> into the EC2 cloud to put the branch through the wringer.
>
> There are 63 open JIRAs with 0.98 fix version:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8115?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.98.0%22%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)
> That's too many. I will be moving a bunch out over the next few days.
>
> Currently there are 4 blockers: HBASE-6873 (clean up coprocessor loading
> failure), HBASE-9997 (Add per KV security details to HBase book),
> HBASE-1005 (TestVisibilityLabels fails occasionally), and HBASE-10031 (Add
> a section on the transparent CF encryption feature to the manual).
>
> There are 6 criticals: HBASE-5954 (add proper fsync support), HBASE-7057
> (store ServerLoad in a table), HBASE-7781 (Provide the ability to run
> integration tests with security enabled), HBASE-8770 (deletes and puts with
> the same ts should be resolved according to mvcc/seqnum), HBASE-9513 (why
> is pe#randomseekscantest way slower in 0.96 than 0.94), and HBASE-9527
> (remove all old api that takes a table name as a byte array). Given the
> current state of these JIRAs, I think all are likely to be moved out except
> HBASE-7781.
>
> During the RC process I will implement HBASE-7781 if it's not been done
> elsewhere (patch?) so we can get security coverage during RC integration
> testing.
>
> Of the remaining issues, 44 are major, 8 are minor, and 1 is trivial.
>
> Some of the major issues are follow ups to the recently committed security
> features. I have it on good authority these will be completed this week.
> Likewise, HBASE-9997 and HBASE-10031.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message