hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodio...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: HBase 0.96.0 performace
Date Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:19:10 GMT
Where is the picture, Jerry?


On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:

> Re-attach the performance comparison picture.
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The picture didn't go through.
>>
>> Correction: the comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and 0.96.1 was done by
>> Nicolas Liochon. This was not done at EBay.
>>
>> In my talk, there was another comparison to show that MTTR improved a lot
>> from 0.94 to 0.96 - this was done at EBay.
>>
>> When Stack cuts 0.96.1 RC0, you would get the list of JIRAs that
>> contributed to the speedup from 0.96.0 to 0.96.1
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Jerry He <jerryjch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,  Ted, and hbase experts
>> >
>> > Below picture is a performance comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and
>> 0.96.1,
>> > shared by Ted Yu in China Hadoop Summit today. This perf testing is
>> said to
>> > be executed on ebay's real cluster.
>> >
>> > It is surprising 0.96.0 is such worse compared to 0.96.1 and even
>> 0.94.14.
>> >  Are these numbers official and the performance degradation true?   What
>> > patch in 0.96.1 fixed this?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message