Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A545110F14 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92110 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2013 00:14:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 92053 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2013 00:14:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 92045 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2013 00:14:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:14:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.192.172] (HELO mail-pd0-f172.google.com) (209.85.192.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:14:13 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so1729179pdj.17 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:13:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GRM31KwA5Ndi5kDgdZZlP3mXdSOIMRWL2EmWogwKU/0=; b=aJsQur/kyv3zhqxlpN4IhYZ/1y9RjbVvPIvbtsuyGKbjv5/KKzKgMsVUF+q0cbPELT gX32GyIPUpZDTly4Jxmckg0dITk5rC2nutH/v+AhFPHYaC0AJurjzJdNT2P3F1/XYLAq mi8NtP/zls4Xni9r0h4hNXmfRpEgOgCCX33Y4kZq2XvMMbYKB8VrapXYh2SEgJIuKYwF UBAOhoZfegM3N1glCF0zwvUU5RmUUwVuQbjsjJJ7VA6XSEYyArpCEbTRvIKu0/prcT8y Y+YQag4SZ3+QSs/afL4nd+1Q83agCxm6g6fTyml9Ma2EmQXQxcHECeLavh0mslae19Lg qGIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXkUoIAeEBDkXb0QllXrwFKOmqjZApjH8fW4iU9mk1bnlA/mlK+Wv77rhwf3FL5UH3uFAq X-Received: by 10.68.143.38 with SMTP id sb6mr10790575pbb.44.1381364032128; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 17:13:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.37.12 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 17:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1381360577.59755.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1381359693.46613.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1381360577.59755.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:13:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? To: dev , lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e3fbe70e42504e857e028 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b2e3fbe70e42504e857e028 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That's on my roadmap, but lacking some time for that ;) I bought a new cluster where I will install Hadoop 1.2.1 or 2.x and replicate my current cluster to it, but still need some time to do that :( But the issue is not just me. Me, I can deal with that. But maybe others might be in the same situation? 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl > That's what I was trying to find out :) > You do not want to upgrade to Hadoop 1.2.1? > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari > To: dev ; lars hofhansl > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:04 PM > Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > Hum. I usually just deploy the .jar on my cluster (hadoop 1.0.3) without > rebuilding anything. Not sure if some others are not doing the same. That > change will break the compatibility with previous version, no? > > > > 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl > > > Should we default the HBase 0.94 builds to Hadoop 1.2.x (1.2.1 > currently)? > > It's the current stable release of the Hadoop. Can't even download 1.0.4 > > anymore unless you navigate to the archive section. > > > > This would just apply to the sample packages in the download section for > > HBase. User should really build a targeted version of HBase to their > > version of Hadoop anyway. > > > > Comments? > > > > > > -- Lars > > > --047d7b2e3fbe70e42504e857e028--