Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jxiang@cloudera.com
 designates 209.85.220.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHXxaiDcX9XjJBMWSCr_LhW6=2E2Z6Y-CHLXyfSzx=GvpZAWgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgGtw3Dr3OYNGpKENOmp3oZW+Y6BAYf9TN2+4d6FrwhWqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgHwQD-fYXWL9vJUT23HAC9a6HjnpauHoVbD+Qygfr+KMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4kjVvj-KV9aRpGEeiLU+eSWb=mXBQWwUY3NaT0ref-GC46ig@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgH86E8njX+kB_rad61Btf7d3LzZ-kZ5NxKUW=_fXJ4vvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4kjVswa6RXhNXYwCFS8An8gYeatb9eaF5WtCU+j5Xhp13OLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgEP8c6aYvu9iOMimiXQO1uxZU660_Q1qw8sPq0oNqfRcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w80FR3Q9iiFR7ixCQ+tMP+G0-bNzk1hcmfS7k_FPvx+sA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w_EojOyKBCgmzN9pcxhi3hygXQ5kc7HztcSpxa0=K6ejQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgF_QZ+xMx7x=w2sEaG99UAw+01dH1yV4hey5aEnWcS67w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHXxaiAr6W36s7QG00xuCWuo9cKawZANRP4HXbp2JXX_P3CJzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOmV22sraTcs-UhVcag=Ff2HKJ3GvT1y_=7k74azXscu7Qh4bA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPzbcGSJJPAOmwP1XwTzLMhxvdiN4QAh9dhPdr2dEC4-DuN0aw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvzVW2ZOEMKPKTmk5-nK6jWbrJGcs0vt9uHOHfHt7UbDu8uFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPzbcGQt8L5KPVppqdv6CjTA5OWphy7oFVGREEAX7CeQfnj+dQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvzVW0D=iSXR5SjLiFC7OwWxWP0AANUjRpUCfoq0s8h=h2Evw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w88=KL=fgwrSbRPqynBdooP3xmEAiYk42F69ac6_4KqVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgEsgiDcuDkTuOL82XG5eRmv_Tf1QEdJb2Qw4ZdK6qMXzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w_bn4MoRj6-Kvd=j==CLmsLWN_EMW+Np2oBVmHsM3N7ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgE6wqvf_AhK5Vv-wWZFUJHiQaUX=MC8pyARuwA0MW+haw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUu0w9kT0tPTJh7DrVCR44eL69HDFMCkBdj0Hk0wSBimUOmDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgGwD31TKCZZ6mZ3vrRfB77vvP0TwFFTUScHfQA0qGNEzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvzVW3Z-vhGnLzzEyukAfg+gocup=+kg8FSKFajHkhm0uHpJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHXxaiDcX9XjJBMWSCr_LhW6=2E2Z6Y-CHLXyfSzx=GvpZAWgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 10:14:38 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOmV22uJiZQe7y7hBLvm=Fg_AZWWeEBMnyfD6_eUYuqTwRDqzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC
From: Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: Stack <stack@duboce.net>,
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Enis_S=F6ztutar?= <enis@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6aa5c031adf04e8662386

--047d7bd6aa5c031adf04e8662386
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can we agree if the IT tests are green for a certain number of runs in a
row, then it's stable?


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Sergey Shelukhin
<sergey@hortonworks.com>wrote:

> It looks like HBASE-9724 got committed. Was it the final patch for it? It=
's
> a small and hopefully safe.
>
> If patch is large and risky, and the feature it fixes is semi-experimenta=
l,
> like HBASE-9696, IMHO it should not be blocker for the release.
> The concern is that we keep making large changes to AM that fix some bugs
> but may introduce more bugs (like it happened with the last one), so it's
> hard to tell when it will stabilize at all.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > To me it feels like HBASE-9724 should go into 0.96.  We're not releasin=
g
> a
> > new rc tonight, it seems really weird to hold up a bug fix to try and h=
it
> > some unknown, and un-agreed upon, deadline.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis S=F6ztutar <enis@apache.org> wro=
te:
> > >
> > >> > Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figu=
re
> > out
> > >> something.
> > >> As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed,
> > >
> > >
> > > It is still open and committed with qualification "Stack:...Was going
> to
> > > try this first but likely needs more..."  and "Elliott: +1 I think it=
's
> > > an improvement even if it doesn't 100% fix the master issue."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker
> > >> against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's
> > raise
> > >> it as such.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it
> > >> if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss
> issues
> > >> anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without
> 9696
> > >> and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and
> more
> > >> fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months.
> > >>
> > >> I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress
> on
> > >> 9563 and 9696.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes.  Lets take this up tomorrow.  Elliott and I are on the master
> issue,
> > > HBASE-9563, this evening.
> > >
> > > Thanks Enis,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity =
to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified th=
at
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediate=
ly
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

--047d7bd6aa5c031adf04e8662386--