Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78BC9105DA for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23688 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2013 04:20:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 23580 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2013 04:19:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 23557 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2013 04:19:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:19:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dsw@cloudera.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.173] (HELO mail-lb0-f173.google.com) (209.85.217.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 04:19:50 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id o14so3875941lbi.32 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:19:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/xYjF9dxGADGCHhR2pkn+YVhydNTObE+EJ0477T2t14=; b=USVKf23aMu1Dge7e1PijPgydLs/NhiT8BUk1Ixx4nvijBhDtMP/r0GIrsGaLEEAsUX bvF9C1KXKx6nM0A2DrHzHG8vNRC/MP+TaNxg/vr9YNmoNP8YWmQlvWUZ2vm/Lz12fwCB SEzf7u0Hlz+hb3c++Kxer6Bp0mmjJBMPdUZ6oMhIcarfRJEPezDTrQYyKbNQHkqg/bXd KISsxEFK+gd2zX6rnyHm9l7vbswlNFGhpXr9efOz5PIX3BfKVq9/t/kzaPnhAJj3+++y DXE1yJ7ZLWgmWt04d/jRG0T7TIKT6z0SjVKswsYNB6uPE8tFBG1u9XEQXYNMPxc/o+OA FRiw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlklwwoJT169Ch5rG1+Qi7PLtKbgQro9uIgT7zqQI/9rGZCfYPn96vTnXKONfA2pppfv9v MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.128.166 with SMTP id np6mr4824075lbb.7.1382156369710; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.141.161 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:19:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:19:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 6th hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download From: Dave Wang To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343ef270e18404e9105b4a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b343ef270e18404e9105b4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Woo hoo! - Dave On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Stack wrote: > Vote passes. 5 +1s and one -0. > > I'll push the release out in the morning. > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stack wrote: > > > hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release. It is intended to supplant > > the 0.94.x series. > > > > hbase-0.96.0RC5 is our sixth hbase-0.96.0 release candidate. > > > > The signed tarballs are available here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC5< > http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/> > > / > > > > Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and > > runs on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x. You must chose the hbase > > that suits your hadoop context. > > > > Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are available > > in this maven staging repo: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-165/ > > > > More than 2k issues [1][2][3][4] are attributed to this version (counting > > fixes done against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases). > > More than 250 fixes have been committed since 0.95.2. Synopsis of the > > main changes between 0.94.x and 0.96.x will follow soon. > > > > Please take it for a spin. We are interested in any issues found but in > > particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a > > 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [5]. > > > > Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0? Please vote +/-1 by Friday, > > October 18th. > > > > Thanks, > > St.Ack > > > > 1. 0.96.0 266 issues http://goo.gl/wLmu1Y > > 2. 0.95.2 340 issues http://goo.gl/4djjE9 > > 3. 0.95.1 265 issues http://goo.gl/TcdckW > > 4. 0.95.0 1263 issues http://goo.gl/Iqcx2i > > 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96 > > > --047d7b343ef270e18404e9105b4a--