Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgEP8c6aYvu9iOMimiXQO1uxZU660_Q1qw8sPq0oNqfRcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgGtw3Dr3OYNGpKENOmp3oZW+Y6BAYf9TN2+4d6FrwhWqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgHwQD-fYXWL9vJUT23HAC9a6HjnpauHoVbD+Qygfr+KMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+4kjVvj-KV9aRpGEeiLU+eSWb=mXBQWwUY3NaT0ref-GC46ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgH86E8njX+kB_rad61Btf7d3LzZ-kZ5NxKUW=_fXJ4vvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+4kjVswa6RXhNXYwCFS8An8gYeatb9eaF5WtCU+j5Xhp13OLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgEP8c6aYvu9iOMimiXQO1uxZU660_Q1qw8sPq0oNqfRcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Enis_S=C3=B6ztutar?= <enis@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:43:42 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMUu0w80FR3Q9iiFR7ixCQ+tMP+G0-bNzk1hcmfS7k_FPvx+sA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6c4b0da087d04e841aa24

--047d7bd6c4b0da087d04e841aa24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

HEADS UP:
I think we may have to sink this one. Our tests ITBLL and ITLAV with CM
fails consistently, and we suspect a problem with HBASE-9612 (although not
confirmed yet)

More details are coming soon after more digging into logs.
Enis


On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Steve Loughran <stevel@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > go
> >
> > well, those are the .gz files, not the JARs, I'll have to download and
> > check...
> >
> >
> Give me list of jars you want a sha for and I'll run them for you against
> the build RC (and publish it)
>
>
>
> > BTW, there's a new Hadoop RC out in staging: 2.2.0
> >
> >
> > The RC is available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.2.0-rc0
> > The RC tag in svn is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.2.0-rc0
>
>
> Yeah.  Hopefully our RC works against it (I didn't try it).
>
> St.Ack
>

--047d7bd6c4b0da087d04e841aa24--