Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-41393-apmail-hbase-dev-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CBD81011F
	for <apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 6452 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2013 19:50:22 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6285 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2013 19:50:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6187 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2013 19:50:05 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:50:05 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.46] (HELO mail-la0-f46.google.com) (209.85.215.46)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:49:59 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id hp15so2291247lab.5
        for <dev@hbase.apache.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=aHlwTLlp4IkVad2zhzLtiuE/pQuxXn8nFJhx7ukCw2M=;
        b=ns1oYxcqRu/eDZ0n8rbkfmrfV9xwGha4aBZJ91WpwIQkQ+ij4zsOhCqvYRnL/rZxND
         bS/ia/zQQgQdoSDHAbxc0/J4yyyaBs3SOfIjpmMXIb0xTEUTJbwJJvxqRGzWF/QniChk
         MIQnFvziWlNCnQ2pC6+UdGeTjBAr+Sp2uvYAWcUFb26TVstLVOKRTAG0yga1k75hvWxH
         7mzuIdBzL98Qq8fWnuZBs02M4lwNTVyyL+rjLJ3FZJYICfVuLRKiXr2b20Cf4uj3E34w
         UzIMtuxRDLr0mZN8TizvIlOuG96npPkTWcmYpu8rgphdj5YYfA9fO7CRYUCDHjClCU7j
         Iz0Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr2828393lag.19.1382644179108; Thu,
 24 Oct 2013 12:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.129.40 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPQV63UbDxfSsKgyh_LYE-HbTtpxf7CWPu3W3Px-mTjDBZcedw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPQV63UbDxfSsKgyh_LYE-HbTtpxf7CWPu3W3Px-mTjDBZcedw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62wt+wigq2JWWcYGYQY0ORVtf_Nh5mHQ9qGRFrkB7D3aEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Do we want HBASE-9820?
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c36e25876904e981efc6
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--089e0160c36e25876904e981efc6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

In hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml, we already have:

  <property>
    <name>hbase.master.logcleaner.plugins</name>

<value>org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.cleaner.TimeToLiveLogCleaner</value>
If downstream project propagates default HBase configuration resources
correctly, the change shouldn't be needed, right ?


On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:

> Small and simple. Do we want it? Or not really good to have this hardcode?
>
> Another option is to exit if plugins is empty...
>

--089e0160c36e25876904e981efc6--