hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 6th hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:43:18 GMT

I downloaded the candidate.  Tried it locally.  I tried the published maven
artifacts in a little hbase-downstreamer project to ensure a simple hadoop1
or hadoop2 app basically works.

I have been babysitting the smaller cluster hbase-it runs that Elliott
mentioned above.  They pass half the time.  The failed half are because of
issues in the test code rather than in core.

Lets fix the Elliott mentioned client issue in a point release.  My guess
is that it won't make a 0.96.1 since I plan on rolling this in a week or so
w/ pointers to released hadoop2 and test fixes but hopefully soon after.

I'll let the vote run till the end of today.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> hbase-0.96.0 will be our next major release.  It is intended to supplant
> the 0.94.x series.
> hbase-0.96.0RC5 is our sixth hbase-0.96.0 release candidate.
> The signed tarballs are available here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.0RC5<http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/>
> / <http://people.apache.org/~stack/0.96.0RC5/>
> Note that hbase-0.96.0 comes in two flavors; a build that includes and
> runs on hadoop-1.x and another for hadoop-2.x.  You must chose the hbase
> that suits your hadoop context.
> Both sets of hbase artifacts, for hadoop1 and for hadoop2, are available
> in this maven staging repo:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-165/
> More than 2k issues [1][2][3][4] are attributed to this version (counting
> fixes done against this and the 0.95.x developer series of releases).
>  More than 250 fixes have been committed since 0.95.2.  Synopsis of the
> main changes between 0.94.x and 0.96.x will follow soon.
> Please take it for a spin.  We are interested in any issues found but in
> particular, we would appreciate feedback on how well the migration of a
> 0.94.x dataset to run under 0.96.0 works [5].
> Should this candidate become hbase-0.96.0?  Please vote +/-1 by Friday,
> October 18th.
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
> 1. 0.96.0 266 issues http://goo.gl/wLmu1Y
> 2. 0.95.2 340 issues http://goo.gl/4djjE9
> 3. 0.95.1 265 issues http://goo.gl/TcdckW
> 4. 0.95.0 1263 issues http://goo.gl/Iqcx2i
> 2. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message