hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94?
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:38:29 GMT
+1, if the current default version of 1 we build against can't even be
downloaded except from the archives, that's not good.


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me as well. Keep on moving forward.
>
> Does this mean we can delete some old API compatibility code soon? I <3
> deleting code ;)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > So this is a resounding: "Maybe"? :)
> >
> >
> > I think we should change the default. HBase should be built from source
> > for a specific version of Hadoop anyway.
> >
> > Ted said +1.
> >
> > Any other opinions?
> >
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94?
> >
> >
> >
> > That's on my roadmap, but lacking some time for that ;) I bought a new
> > cluster where I will install Hadoop 1.2.1 or 2.x and replicate my current
> > cluster to it, but still need some time to do that :(
> >
> > But the issue is not just me. Me, I can deal with that. But maybe others
> > might be in the same situation?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> >
> > That's what I was trying to find out :)
> > >You do not want to upgrade to Hadoop 1.2.1?
> > >
> > >
> > >-- Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > >To: dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>; lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:04 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Hum. I usually just deploy the .jar on my cluster (hadoop 1.0.3) without
> > >rebuilding anything. Not sure if some others are not doing the same.
> That
> > >change will break the compatibility with previous version, no?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> > >
> > >> Should we default the HBase 0.94 builds to Hadoop 1.2.x (1.2.1
> > currently)?
> > >> It's the current stable release of the Hadoop. Can't even download
> 1.0.4
> > >> anymore unless you navigate to the archive section.
> > >>
> > >> This would just apply to the sample packages in the download section
> for
> > >> HBase. User should really build a targeted version of HBase to their
> > >> version of Hadoop anyway.
> > >>
> > >> Comments?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -- Lars
> > >>
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message