Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nidmgg@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGpTDNfgKq=XtTehHmwZwjc6Ex2+iNQvXGhNn-5XDdott+JwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGpTDNfgKq=XtTehHmwZwjc6Ex2+iNQvXGhNn-5XDdott+JwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:13:48 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOEq2C7V=9PreFjHjNfB88b5wGz=jCF7s+GDQXvVV+8+5Uh6pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Random reads are 5x faster in 0.96.0! Or not
From: Demai Ni <nidmgg@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdca04293ee2f04e72442ac

--047d7bdca04293ee2f04e72442ac
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hi, J-D,

It is a very exciting improvement. If we'd like to make 0.94 user benefit
from this, will backport HBASE-7008 be good enough, code wise? Certainly,
more testing is needed to guard it. Thanks.

Demai


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey devs,
>
> I was testing performance of 0.96.0RC3 vs 0.94.12 and found that random
> reads are 5x faster out of the box in the former, party! But wait, no,
> HBASE-7008 disabled Nagle's algo and it was only applied to 0.95, so if you
> configure that in 0.94 it becomes even faster than 0.96 by a small margin.
>
> Just a reminder when doing your own testing,
>
> J-D
>

--047d7bdca04293ee2f04e72442ac--